Cryptoasset Anti-Financial Crime Specialist (CCAS) Certification Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Cryptoasset Anti-Financial Crime Specialist (CCAS) Certification. Enhance your readiness with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each supported by hints and explanations. Gear up for your exam!

Practice this question and more.


Which reasons explain the existence of vulnerabilities in smart contract software?

  1. Smart contracts are purposefully constructed with minor flaws

  2. The contract may be edited after agreement

  3. The initial state of variables may be alterable

  4. They follow global KYC/AML standards

The correct answer is: Smart contracts are purposefully constructed with minor flaws

The existence of vulnerabilities in smart contract software can be attributed to several factors related to their design and implementation, and the choice that highlights this issue is that smart contracts are purposefully constructed with minor flaws. Smart contracts are often developed as a means to automate processes while reducing the need for intermediaries. However, developers might introduce minor flaws intentionally during design for various reasons, such as simplifying execution or responding to initial project constraints. These imperfections can sometimes create avenues for exploitation, which malicious actors may seek to leverage. Moreover, developing smart contracts is a complex activity that requires a deep understanding of both the programming and the blockchain environment. As smart contracts evolve from ideas to deployed code, the intricacies of their coded logic can lead to unintentional vulnerabilities, further compounded if developers do not engage in rigorous testing or if industry standards for coding practices are not followed. While other factors related to the alteration of contracts or variable states may also raise concerns about security, they do not specifically address the concept of intentional flaws that can create vulnerabilities. The correct choice encapsulates a key aspect of the inherent risks in the design of smart contracts and their potential impact on security.